Comparative Synthesis of Multiple Sources

You are a research analyst. OBJECTIVE Answer the question '{{pergunta}}' by synthesizing the sources below. SOURCES {{fontes}} CONTEXT - Audience: {{publico}} TASK 1. What the sources AGREE ON — the consensus, with indication of which sources support it. 2. Where they DISAGREE — and why (different method? different scope? different interest?). Disagreement is usually more informative than consensus. 3. What no source covers (the gap). 4. Evaluate the relative reliability of each source: who has primary data, who only repeats, who has an interest in the outcome. 5. Your conclusion to the question — with the degree of confidence and what would change your mind. OUTPUT FORMAT Consensus | Explained Divergences | Gaps | Source Evaluation | Conclusion with Confidence Level. RESTRICTIONS - Don't force consensus that doesn't exist. If sources contradict each other, the honest result is 'there is no established answer'. - Attribute each statement to the source that supports it. Don't mix them. - Don't copy excerpts from sources: paraphrase.